SATURDAY JAN 11, 2025
×
Search AeroXplorer
Rescued Jeju Air Flight Attendant is Awake and Speaking, Hospital Official Reports

Rescued Jeju Air Flight Attendant is Awake and Speaking, Hospital Official Reports

BY HADI AHMAD Published on December 30, 2024 9 COMMENTS

A 33-year-old flight attendant is one of the only survivors of the recent Jeju Air tragedy in Muan, South Korea. According to a hospital official, the flight attendant is awake and speaking to medical staff.

 

Flight 2216

 



ADVERTISEMENT • REMOVE ALL ADS

 

Jeju Air Flight 2216 was a scheduled flight from Bangkok's Suvarnabhumi Airport (BKK) to Muan International Airport (MWX) in the southwest corner of South Korea.

 

On December 29th, 2024, the flight overran the runway in Muan while attempting to land. The aircraft operating, a Boeing 737-800 (HL8088), crashed into an embankment past the end of the runway and exploded. Out of the 181 occupants, 179 perished.

 

 

 

The exact cause of the crash is still being investigated. CCTV footage from cameras by the Muan Airport runway shows the 737 skidding down the runway without its landing gear deployed.

 

It was revealed that as the aircraft was preparing to land, it was warned just minutes before about the potential for a bird strike. This was followed by a mayday alert from the pilots one minute later.

 



ADVERTISEMENT • REMOVE ALL ADS

 

At 9:00 am local time, the aircraft attempted an emergency landing but was forced to go around again after the landing gear did not deploy. The 737 made another attempt from the opposite direction, again with no landing gear, which later resulted in the aircraft overrunning.

 

Survivors

 

Of the 181 occupants, two survived the crash. Both are Jeju Air flight attendants: a 33-year-old gentleman currently only identified by his surname, Lee, and a 25-year-old woman identified by her surname, Koo.

 

Lee is reportedly awake and speaking. According to Ju Woong, director of the Ewha Woman's University Seoul Hospital, noted that Lee told doctors that he "had already been rescued" from the crash when he regained consciousness. 

 

Photo: AeroXplorer | Peter Lam

 

Ju reported that Lee is being treated in the hospital's intensive care unit (ICU) for multiple fractures. At this time, he does not appear to have any signs of memory loss and is "fully able to communicate".

 

However, Lee has not been asked anything specific regarding the crash because of fears that it may impact his recovery process.

 

As for Koo, she is reportedly in stable condition at a different hospital. She suffered injuries to her ankle and head. The medical staff treating her have declined to comment anything further.

 

Recommended for you:
Could You Survive a Plane Crash? The Unlikely Science of Plane Crash Survival With air travel consistently being heralded as the safest form of public transport, most of us do not board a plane pondering our chances of survival in the event of a crash Read more »

 



ADVERTISEMENT • REMOVE ALL ADS

 

Koo and Lee are the only two confirmed survivors from Flight 2216, the deadliest aviation disaster involving a South Korean airliner since Korean Air 801 in 1997.

 

This tragedy became the deadliest aviation incident on South Korean soil, surpassing the crash of Air China 129 in 2002. It was also Jeju Air's first fatal crash in its history.

 AeroXplorer is on Telegram! Subscribe to the AeroXplorer Telegram Channel to receive aviation news updates as soon as they are released. View Channel 
Hadi Ahmad
Lifelong aviation enthusiast raised in Central Illinois. 777 is the best plane BTW.

Comments (9)

Nalliah Thayabharan At 8:54 am the Boeing 737-800NG operating the Jeju Air Flight 2216 was authorized to land at Muan International Airport in South Korea. As the plane was preparing to land, it was warned at 8:57 am about the potential for a bird strike. A minute later, it issued a mayday alert.At 9:00 a.m, the plane attempted an emergency landing, being forced to go around again after the landing gear was not deployed. A minute later, it received authorization to attempt a landing from the opposite direction. Most pilots are trained for situations like this. The crash occurred as the aircraft attempted to perform a belly landing,touching down 1,200m along the runway, sliding down the runway on the engine nacelles with a sustained nose-high attitude. It continued 250m past the runway threshold before colliding with an embankment holding the ILS array and exploding. If they were in a stabilised approach the landing gear would be down WAY before the bird strike zone. The Boeing 737-800NG did a go-around with no problems. Then nothing like this has ever happened, a plane comes in without landing gear, speed close to take off and on at least at 50% power until it contacted an object on the ground - Pilots missed alternate landing gear extension, alternate flap extension, approach and landing speed judgement, diversion, not correctly configure the aircraft for landing, way too fast, way too far down the runway before touchdown, 15-degree nose-up. Either a complete loss of throttle control or the pilots tried to climb out and it was too late. We have seen pilots ignore repeated alarms in the cockpit, warnings from the GPWS many times including PIA8303 and Air France 447. This is more than likely another example of a crew doing everything other than what they should have been doing. There are 3 hydraulic systems aboard the 737 - system A, B and Stand by. The A system powers the landing gear for retraction, extension, and nose wheel steering. The B system powers the flaps and leading edge devices, with an electric backup that can extend and retract the flaps. All have redundancy but a complete failure of all 3 hydraulic systems and the backup electrical system to operate the flaps is damn near impossible. APU can provide electrical power to the electric motor driven pumps (EMDP's) and thus supply hydraulic pressure. One of the amazing things that Captain Sullenberger did, when they first hit the birds on takeoff was immediately start the APU, before he did anything else, as I guess he knew he might lose both engine power from the birds. Hydraulics not required for emergency use of flaps and landing gear on 737. Pilots should be able to manually drop the landing gear no matter what. Landing gear can be manually extended with the 3 red handles-Right Main, Nose and Left Main-behind crew seats on the floor, physically connected to each strut that when pulled releases the gear which falls and locks into place by their own weight and wind drag. On Boeing 737-800 NG, the manual extension handles will function with the landing gear lever in any position. However it does take time. Crew only gave themselves 7 minutes to execute check lists and final between loss of signal on initial approach and attempted go around. There’s really no explanation for the gear being retracted other than the pilot forgot. The Control Tower should have informed them that their landing gear was not down though. The aircraft won’t even allow use of thrust reversers unless you have main gear strut compression, in this case with the gear still retracted there may not be any thrust reversers nor spoilers available. The lack of ADS-B during the final landing implies a complete loss of power. Passengers from the same aircraft 2 days ago reported one engine kept switching off during the flight. The aircraft diverted to Incheon International Airport while operating Jeju Air flight 8135 to Beijing Daxing International Airport originating from Jeju International Airport. The aircraft was in cruise flight transiting the Yellow Sea at FL320 when the flight crew declared an emergency. A descent and diversion to Searle Incheon International Airport (ICN) was then carried out. Flight crew squawked emergency transponder code 7700, declaring an emergency when established on the descent on track to the diversion airport. The aviation industry is built on redundancy and there are very few single-point failures in airplane design or airplane operations A combination of unlucky factors including ongoing mechanical issues, a bird strike, and poor crew resource management caused this crash. Also it appears the airport was expecting an emergency landing. MWX runway 19 has a Landing Distance 2800m. The end of Runway 19 is about 6 m below its threshold. The embankment is to raise the localizer array, to compensate for the runway slope. However, within the United States and Canada these would be required to be mounted on frangible support structures. You want the support structure to break-away and cause as minimal damage as possible in a scenario like this. You would not be allowed to construct an earth mound like this within the runway overruns. This localizer is about 150m off the overrun, which would violate North American Airfield criteria, but it's a Korean Airport so regulations are different. My guessing Birdstrike with severe damage on the right engine and crew incorrectly shuts down the left engine, losing both engines. Immediate turn back to land tailwind opposite direction. Split decisions, forgot the landing gear. The plane wasn't ready for that belly landing at all.
11d ago • Reply
J. Random Airtraveller If the plane was forced to go around again after the landing gear was not deployed, how could they then forget the landing gear?
Wayne I agree somewhat with your analysis but it’s hard to Monday morning the thing. Consider after the go around both engines failed perhaps due to the bird strike and now you are in a marginal position to even make the runway, in which case it’s now “Quick get the gear handles I’m going for the runway”. Also consider they were a glide to get to the runway on the initial approach and able to get an engine relit and making power at the same time not in a good position to land so he initiated a single engine go around so as to configure for a proper approach and then boom the engine they got relit goes south and they are dead stick to the runway. Even stranger things have happened to cause crashes. This one is very strange indeed.
8d ago • Reply
Boyd Totally agree with your assessment. Not many people are understanding this perspective on how it may have happened. Sure, the gear and flaps could have been deployed but they operate at a much slower rate on backup systems. There is the uncertainty too of if or to what extent they would deploy before touchdown. So, in a low or no thrust situation, it becomes secondary to getting her on the ground.
Capt 777 Terry Gersdorf Couldn't have said it better Nalliah . Spot on, too many indicators led to crew overload. Lack of training and experience and shut down the good engine. Failure to lower the gear.
8d ago • Reply
R. Leland Exactly. This was a "deadstick" landing for whatever reason. No flaps or gear due to no time to deploy or perceived need to extend glide. Dual flameout scenarios are rarely trained by the airlines. The accident sequence began with an unnecessary rejected landing on the first approach. Waiting for the MOLIT/NTSB report.
8d ago • Reply
Charlie Howller As you say this is crew training and crew experience, not a Boeing or bird strike. Mass confusion and no body is flying the plane. I know, when Pan Am closed I flew for an Asia airline for a year.
8d ago • Reply
Charlie Howller As you say this is crew training and crew experience, not a Boeing or bird strike. Mass confusion and no body is flying the plane. I know, when Pan Am closed I flew for an Asia airline for a year.
8d ago • Reply
Alfred Why is there not any comment about the concrete wall? Is it commonplace to build huge immovable structures 700 feet from the end of a runway? Wouldn't it occur to somebody to make sure that the ILS structure be of low mass just in case a plane were to skid off the end of a runway? If this wall were not there, this might have been a very different story. I realize that this is a naive comment, so please correct me where necessary.
3d ago • Reply

Add Your Comment

SHARE

TAGS

NEWS Jeju Air Flight 2216Jeju AirJeju Air CrashSouth Korea Survivor

RECENTLY PUBLISHED

Could You Survive a Plane Crash? The Unlikely Science of Plane Crash Survival With air travel consistently being heralded as the safest form of public transport, most of us do not board a plane pondering our chances of survival in the event of a crash. But, is it possible to survive one? INFORMATIONAL READ MORE »
Maldivian Airlines Introduces First-Ever Widebody Aircraft, Plans New China Flights Maldivian, the government-owned national airline of the Maldives, has just welcomed its first-ever wide body aircraft: the Airbus A330-200. With the new aircraft, the carrier also plans brand-new long haul international flights to China. NEWS READ MORE »
Thousands of Flights Impacted as Winter Storm Blair Hits U.S. Winter Storm Blair has unleashed a huge blast of snow, ice, and freezing temperatures across the Central and Eastern United States. As of Sunday afternoon, over 6,700 flights and counting have been disrupted. This includes cancelations and significant delays leaving passengers scrambling to change flights and adjust travel plans. NEWS READ MORE »


SHOP

$2999
NEW!AeroXplorer Aviation Sweater Use code AVGEEK for 10% off! BUY NOW

FOLLOW US ONLINE